Reflecting on our Sr. High Winter Retreat

Primary Audience – Our students and the fine folks of MEFC
Secondary Audience – Youth workers who can relate

We just got back from Harvey Cedars on Monday afternoon and I am enjoying that post-retreat afterglow/hangover that youth pastors/volunteers know very well. It’s a great way to spend a weekend but each year has its challenges. For one, in today’s crazy busy culture, it’s tough for students and volunteer leaders to commit to a weekend like this, especially since we go from Friday-Monday to take advantage of the holiday weekend. We dragged ourselves there Friday and left on quite the high note Monday afternoon.

It may be a bit too early to write this post but here some initial thoughts on this past weekend’s retreat. Each year, I appreciate our group more and more. We keep doing movie-themed retreats because if you have a good enough movie, you have a working metaphor that can last the weekend. Further, it’s so difficult to discuss a movie over a month (given that few students can attend each week of the month) and of course, we tend to forget scenes and lines as time goes on.

This year was the ever-popular, The Matrix. It being our second time doing at Montvale, it was the first time for anyone in this group (as this class of seniors were still jr. highers last time). Though I hate doing “repeats” (I know, I know, work smarter not harder but still…), we were able to build off of the previous retreat and offer add some more serious content. Since last year’s retreat on Bill Maher’s Religulous and our typical youth group gatherings, I have a lot of faith in our group. We may never become an gigantic-sized youth group, but we are going to be a deep one.

They caught on pretty well, asked good questions during our recap, followed along during our lesson time and had some pretty intense small group sessions. I know it sounds like I am exaggerating (and maybe even bragging) so forgive me, but I am so grateful for this group. One of the biggest discouragements in ministry is when you offer something that you think is solid and the feedback is negative or apathetic. One of the greater encouragements is seeing students connect with deeper content and also hearing them say, “Wow, I never thought of our faith like that before” and “I needed this.”

They’re not perfect kids (I blame the volunteers ;-) but they continue to demonstrate their desire to grow in their faith. Even our time of worship is improving! We have a solid senior class that is leaving and I feel that we have some underclassmen that are ready to go. The combination of great homes and Pastor Tim Nye’s Junior High ministry is yielding fruit in each new 9th grade class. I needed it too and a few of our leaders offered similar sentiments. It’s not because we are discouraged. In fact, we find ourselves in a good rhythm these days but I think we needed it because we are committed to this work. May the Lord forgive us for our missed opportunities and our shortcomings and may He bless our faithfulness as students draw closer to Him. Indeed these are special times for us and though we are tired, we are grateful.

Question: What If Adam and Eve Were Not Beautiful?

Yes, I am obsessed with Adam and Eve …

The other day I wrote a somewhat serious post about the historicity of Adam and Eve.
Today, I want to ask, what if they were not as attractive as we have made them out to be?

I have heard countless people describe Eve to be a ravishing beauty and Adam to be a muscular, handsome dude.

But what if they were not? What if instead of Tom and Giselle, they were more like George Costanza and Ugly Betty?

What makes me ask such a thing? I don’t know it’s a blog.

What makes me think they might not have been as attractive as the flannel board pictures in Sunday School?
Because the Bible describes Jesus as a mild-looking man (Is. 53:2’s prophetic description).

What if Adam was bald and had a beer gut and what if Eve looked more like Leah than Rachel and spoke with a lisp?

Of course it doesn’t matter what they actually looked like, unless we need them to be beautiful.

And what about this glorified body of Jesus that we are to receive upon our entrance into eternity? Further, what about all this last shall be first stuff too? If you were not attractive on earth, will you be a hottie in heaven? If you were a model on the cover of Christian Men’s Health, will you look like Homer Simpson (or Gary Busey or Steve Buscemi in heaven?

What if our heavenly appearance was in direct relation to your heart on earth? Ouch.
What if our heavenly appearance was in direct relation to our tithing record, or our service to others? We gonna have a lot of ugly peeps up there :-)
What if God’s idea of beauty is completely different to our earthy understanding of it?

Why Genesis Is Important to Youth Workers

Among the reasons, why I have been posting a few thoughts on my readings of Genesis is that these questions are not just my own – but they reflect years of discussions with doubters, Christian and non-Christian. Even more, many of these thoughts have been asked by students over the years. If you are a part of an evangelical culture that allows for the expression of doubts and questions, you will know from your own experiences that this is a good thing.

Having questions about the Bible is not wrong or heretical. In fact, it’s necessary for any disciple to be a learning one and among the ways we learn is from questions. The problem becomes when we place ourselves over the authority of Scripture and/or objectify God as if He were a being to satisfy our intellectual curiosity or a being that simply exists to give us what we want. God was not created for our amusement, but rather we as part of His creation for His pleasure, glory, and communion.

So where does a humble, truth-searching disciple start? The Beginning seems a fair place. And so, we find ourselves reading through Genesis with a lot of questions. I am not sure if it’s an exaggeration to say that I have been asked more times about the topic of evolution and the Bible than I have about the validity of the resurrection and whether or not pre-marital sex is really an “abomination”. The bottom line is students are interested in the topic of origins. And can you blame them?

I remember the first time someone my age told me that they believed in theistic evolution. It startled me because I believed his faith to not only be quite genuine but one that I greatly admired. Initially, I dismissed it as, “Well not everyone can be perfect. Some people struggle with porn and love Jesus and some people struggle with Darwinism and love Jesus. May the Lord loosen the chains that grip our hearts …” Some time later, I accepted that this was his conviction in the same way that I accept that some people love the Lord just as much as I do but really believe that the consumption of alcohol is sinful.

Certainly, I used to see such questioning as the beginning of the slippery slope that would eventually lead to the destruction of their faith but things changed for me. I remember a student in my first church telling me he believed in evolution. I began counting the days when I would hear the news of him quitting his faith, it never came and he’s a growing believer today (Facebook told me so).

Mark my words, there are many who call themselves the same type of Christian as you, who will hold very similar beliefs as you but are not following Jesus. Relax and know the Lord will be their judge (and yours). But take comfort in the realization, that there are many who call themselves a very different type of Christian, that have different beliefs but join you in the praise, “Christ is Risen from the dead – Hallelujah!”

After a few years in youth ministry, you begin to realize that not only are students not going to hold many of your convictions, you also realize that you do want them to. Why is that you say? Because for the students who are pursuing a growing relationship with God, they are to be led by the Holy Spirit. This releases me as a youth pastor (and more importantly, parents) from being their personal conscience to being guides who love, nurture, and serve them along their journey.

Genesis is important to me as a youth pastor because in a student’s search for identity, they inevitably come here. When I am teaching about Genesis, whether in a group context or one-on-one, I emphasize that among the major themes of Genesis is that God is the sovereign, loving Creator of All and He is the God of Abraham. Certainly, unpacking that reveals my evangelical convictions but those two points are crucial for any student trying to make sense of a fallen world with a God who is near.

Thoughts on Reading Through Genesis – Were Adam and Eve Real?

Intended Audience – Open-minded followers of Jesus who enjoy searching the richness of the Scriptures. This post is not to undermine our faith but rather, to strengthen it. Frankly, I’d rather think about these types of questions as opposed to wonder if Brett Favre is going to retire or what’s going to happen on American Idol. Hope that helps.

As I mentioned in the last post, I have always carried a sense of frustration as I read through the Bible. Some of it is due to my skeptical nature, another part is due to my 21st Century, Western perspectives trying to engage an inspired, ancient, middle-eastern text written in Hebrew. I’m sure there are several other factors but to cut to the chase, I find Genesis to be filled with questions. Know that I love the text, questions and all, because I believe that struggle and prayer lead to a deeper faith.

In the previous post, I asked if the penalty of sin was too severe? At first glance, I believe it is. However, after a better understanding of the character of God, and the severity of sin, the story of the fall of humanity is tragic to say the least. However, I find praising God for His love for humanity and His redemption of all creation and for giving us a choice.

Today I put the question out there, “Were Adam and Eve real people?” It used to anger me that people would even question such a thing. It’s right there in the Bible, is that not good enough? Throughout my upbringing and during my undergraduate, I was taught that if you did not take one part of the Bible literally, than you could not take other parts literally. So if you wanted to the resurrection of Jesus to be literally true, than you needed things like the Creation account to also be literally true.

Here’s why it’s in question for me:

If you read commentaries and studies on Genesis, you will notice there is a lot of figurative language in Genesis 1 especially. (It’s quite beautiful too).  Why is it written that way?

Similar Ancient Near East Accounts. (This is what got me thinking about it this question)
Example:
“The description of human beings in the Babylonian Atrahasis. The background to this passage is a strike on the part of the lesser gods who are tired of doing heavy labor on behalf of the major gods. They insist that they be replaced. Belet-ili, the mother god, takes clay and mixes it with the blood of the instigator of the strike, then the text says:

After she had mixed the clay,
She summoned the Anunna, the great gods,
The Igigi, the great gods, spat upon the clay.”
(exert taken from this biologos post)

Adam – simply means “mankind”. It may be hairsplitting, but a name like that tends to favor the figurative rather than the literal.

Some of our early church fathers didn’t see Adam and Eve as historical figures.
“Who would be so childish as to think that God was like a human gardener and planted a paradise in Eden facing the east, and in it made a real visible tree, so that one could acquire life by eating its fruit with real teeth or, again, could participate in good and evil by eating what he took from the other tree? And if the text says that God walked in the garden in the evening, or Adam hid himself under the tree, I cannot think that anyone would dispute that these things are said in the figurative sense, in an effort to reveal certain mysteries by means of an apparent historical tale and not by something that actually took place. . . . . ” (First Principles – 4: 16 by Origen of Alexandria) – Ouch – that one hurts.

I know Paul writes about Adam in Romans but if I want to be honest, you could likely justify either presupposition.
However, Romans 5:12 (“Just as sin entered through one man …”) seems to point at a historical Adam. It would have been different to me had he written, “Just as sin entered humanity or mankind or the human race …”

So here’s where I am with this. I am not convinced either way, though I lean towards the historical Adam and am fascinated by the figurative argument. In all honesty, I have no problem that God could have created the universe and all it contains in 6 days, 6 months, 6 million years or 6 seconds.

I have no problem with Adam and Eve (although I do think when if/when I meet them in heaven, I am going to kick Adam in the shins and try to insult Eve by saying something like, “You are not as pretty as the picture my Sunday School teacher showed me on the flannel board” and “So you’re the ones we have to thank for cancer, telemarketers, traffic, death, and country music.” It being heaven and all, I’ll forgive them, hug them, and invite them over for a game of “Apples To Apples” while listening to music by the Cranberries, Lemonheads and Fionna. I’ll have an enormous fruit buffet, all in my beautiful backyard which I call the “Garden of Eatin'” How do you like them app… ;-)

Here’s what I know, I no longer need them to be real. And here’s why. Whenever we equate something non-essential to the Resurrection, we undermine the central foundation of our theology. If I get to heaven and God tells me that Adam and Eve were fictitious characters created to give the children of Israel a frame of reference and exalt the truth that God is the sovereign Creator of all things, I won’t assume that this being  is really the devil and that I am in hell. I’d like to think that I’d chuckle and ask what else was I wrong about and God would spend the time telling me, or maybe He would just spit in the dirt, touch my head and allow the scales to fall off my theological eyes – it’s up to Him.

So in the end, I have two questions, Do you believe Adam and Eve were real? And do you need them to be? And a bonus question, Do you believe that it undermines the Resurrection to equate the Creation account with it? And a bonus, bonus question, Does this threaten your view of inspiration?

Interested in reading more? Check out:
The Biologos Forum – Science and Faith in Dialogue
Scot McKnight’s many excellent posts under “Adam”
and this Youtube Clip

Reflecting on the Fall of Humanity and The Choice God Allows

Note: I am making a couple of observations as I read through the Bible. A lot of these are thoughts that began a while ago, most recently in seminary but trying to give them a place now. Feel free to disagree, reframe, push back, complain, ask for clarification or comment however you like (the only rule is to be honest and respectful).

The Adam and Eve account has always been a frustrating one for me on a number of levels.

1. The first few chapters of Genesis functions differently than rest of Genesis (and the OT for that matter).
2. When I get to heaven, I am going to ask, what ever happened to Adam and Eve? You bored me through genealogies and the book of Numbers and could not give me a little more about Adam and Eve? Was there any redemption after their exile? Did they ever see God again? Did they stay together after Cain and Abel? But Genesis gives us nothing – hmmm, suspicious.
3. Were they real people or more of a literary device to help create a point of origin and a backdrop for the story of Abraham and the eventual birth of Israel?
4. Was the consequence of their sin too severe? I mean, all they did was take a bite out of a piece of fruit. Why does God bother with even creating the tree of good and evil? And still, people have done much worse and have been not charged with being the reason for the “fall of all humanity”.

Well let’s go in reverse order as the latter are the more important questions to us today (at least to me).
Humanity is fallen, it’s corrupt, it’s depraved. And while the word carries so much baggage today, humanity is “sinful”. During my most severe and honest sessions of doubt, I cannot accept the fact that our morality has evolved this way. In some sense, society has become more civil along the millennia, but in another sense, the human heart seems just as selfish and I cannot see something like Darwinism to account for this (and I am somewhat sympathetic to Darwin for a post-conservative Christian). Frankly, it feels more that we are cursed, stained, and doomed and the Biblical narrative of creation, fall and the need for redemption works very well for me.

Why does God bother with a creating this Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil?
Earlier I saw a tweet that said something like asking a toddler to play with the loud toys is like asking a fraternity to guard your daiquiri maker. In some sense, the tree is not a big deal for me. I know that sounds dangerously arrogant but my point is this, God asked Adam and Eve to not do something. He could have said, don’t cross the Line of Absolute Truth or take a ride on the Unicorn of Unity or don’t pee in the Pond of Peace. So in some sense, I’m ok with the “Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil” but I don’t really need it to be a tree – make sense?

Here’s what I need though. A loving God that offers humanity a choice. A choice to obey or rebel. If you followed my “Everything Has a Reason” posts, you will remember that the idea of choice is essential to me because without it, you cannot have love.

Is the punishment too severe?
At first glance it seems it is. However, we need to understand several things: God’s divine intention of creation, His attributes of holiness and just how terrible humanity’s rebellion really is. I am not sure a more dramatic title could have been found than “The Fall”. It ruined everything. Sin defiled the relationship between God the Creator and Humanity His creation and also spoiled the relationship between humanity and the rest of creation.

In some sense, Adam and Eve’s rebellion demonstrates that A. They want to be their own God. 2. Worse, they don’t really need God. 3. Their pride trumps their obedience. When put like that, I am afraid that the story could have been entitled, “The Fall of Tim Ghali” and not much today would be different.

So as I sojourn through this fallen world following the risen Savior, I observe the frustrating complexity, the suffering and the beauty of it all. It’s only in this framework can you have something like The Jersey Shore be as popular as it is, yawn in the middle of Handel’s Messiah and be moved when your child with a face smeared by mac and cheese kisses you and tells you that he loves you. It’s a crazy, flawed and beautiful world.

Reflections on Eden – I’m Sure It was Beautiful but Was It Boring Too?

Over the weekend, I read the first few chapters of Genesis and like most people, I’m quite captivated by the idea of the perfect life of Eden. To be honest, it’s not the frolicking in nudity with my soulmate. Though there is something cool about having a giraffe and a pack of coyotes as pets that all got along, it’s not that either. At this point, insightful Christian leaders will assume that I am captivated by the idea of taking walks with God in the cool of the night. To talk to my Creator is an idea I have thought about many times and await the day when this becomes my reality.

But something else caught my mind’s eye and that was imagining the idea of living in a world that made sense. I’ve thought of the idea of Eden being sin-free and pain-free before but what does a reality of wholeness actually mean? Beyond the coyote laying down with the giraffe, I have trouble imagining a world where that is not odd. A world without selfishness, scheming, and swindling but rather a world of selflessness, submissiveness, and serving. Even if you do not take the early chapters of Genesis literally, the idea of Eden is compelling.

We would be quick to point out that heaven is what Eden was like. Or at least that’s what some of us think. Maybe God will surprise us. But I have worried about heaven too. I said this at Second Mile service a few months ago that I used to worry that heaven would be boring. And in reading about Eden, can I confess to you that there was a part of me that thought that this sort of existence might be boring? Can I admit that my mind raced that perhaps it was this boredom that led Adam and Eve to consider the words of the serpent? Is peace and perfection boring? As you may recall, Agent Smith told Morpheus in the first Matrix that the Machines had been built a world that was perfect but the humans rejected it because they needed some type of struggle to feel human.

I can somewhat imagine a world where peace is possible. For the most part, my local life is lived in peace. Fortunately, I serve in a church where I have access to things like struggle and conflict. My life may be free of physical violence but it is certainly not free from disunity and selfishness. A lot of the peace that I observe is a forced peace. Meaning you must be peaceful or suffer the consequences. This is one of the many benefits of civilization and societal living.

However, what does a world look like where there is complete peace? Here’s my best answer. I assumed such a place had to be boring because of my fallen, sinful, narrow-minded nature. It’s not completely my fault, this is the only world I have had access to. But to use the real Biblical metaphor of the lion laying down with the lamb – it’s not a forced peace like I assume it is. But rather it’s a peace where the lion would not think of harming the lamb. To them, it would be unimaginable – it’s the only reality that they know.

Eden was a place where evil was unimaginable. Granted, that story of Adam and Eve tells us of their fall into temptation. Though they knew immediately that they had fallen, they did not expect the consequences and the curses. Prior to the fall (and the idea of the Return to Eden), I imagine it was a selfless place where the interests of others naturally came first. I have never experienced complete joy but I like to wonder what that looks like in a world where there is no pain but complete restoration of creation, our bodies, our relationships and the divine intention that God had created us with. Honestly, when I look at it like that, it doesn’t sound boring at all.

Reading Your Bible in a Year? Some Advice From a Guy Who Has Started It 189 Times and Read Through It …

… 5 times.
Is that why you clicked – to see how many times I have read through the Bible? Well, I’m glad you did, now keep reading.

Blessings to those who have resolved to read their Bible in a year. You are in for a beautiful and difficult 2011. There will be times when you are reading that you think to yourself, “This is amazing. God you are so good.” Then there will be other moments that you think, “This is terrible. Is this really what I believe?” “I have never even heard this before.” “This is why my pastor never preaches out of the Old Testament – Wait this is the New Testament???”

Let me be honest, I’m not sure reading the Bible in a year is always the best idea if you want to learn Scripture. You have heard the expression, “Drinking out of a firehouse.”? It’s hard to appreciate the Scripture’s riches in our 10-20 minute daily readings. However, what everyday plans are good for is the discipline of reading Scripture and that has its own virtues.

So here are a couple of thoughts I’ve picked up over the years. Feel free to add your own.

Quick note here – I have never been one to read the Bible in the morning. For one, I’m not really a morning person. Two, I hate the idea of looking at a clock and thinking I need to get going (“Sorry God, I gotta get the donuts”). I begin my morning in prayer and I feel later in the day allows for more time for study and reflection. So the following suggestions assume that. But do what works for you.

First Time Readers
1. Don’t worry about the days that you miss. I used to use my day off to catch up but I’d like to encourage you to keep moving forward.
2. Don’t worry about creating the ideal conditions. I used to have a whole ritual for my prayer/Scripture times. Coffee/Tea, proper conditions, optimal lighting, and worshipful mood – I never made it through those years.
As odd as it may sound, I used to avoid my readings after a difficult or an anger-filled day. I found it hypocritical if my thoughts and actions were unChristian throughout the day and then sat down to pray and read. Further, I felt bad that I wasn’t in the mood to “be spiritual”. Later I realized, that there would be few days that I felt at my spiritual optimum and that simply beginning my time with confession and a request for an open heart was an appropriate start (and maybe all that God wanted from me).
3. Consider switching translations as you go along. It’s ok, God won’t mind. You may find the new voice to be helpful, especially during the days you are struggling. Even better, consider using a Bible without the chapter-verse breaks like from the Books of the Bible Series. Also take advantage of the digital Bibles like YouVersion (they have their own reading plan that you can read on your computer, iPhone, etc.
4. Enjoy the silence. It’s tempting to finish the required reading and jump up to brush your teeth but one of the best disciplines of spiritual formation is to simply sit in silence. Mind you I didn’t say prayer, but silence. Sometimes the Lord speaks to us in these times.
5. Spend some time in prayer (and do so throughout your day).  Whether it be after the time of silence or whenever, spend adequate time in prayer. Among many blessings, it opens the Scriptures and allows for communion with the Lord.

Second, Third, Several Time Readers
1. See above. Did you skip the first time reader part? What because you have already read through once, you got it all figured out. It’s a good thing you’ve resolved to read the Bible again, your pride is out of control :)
2. Realize the importance that Scripture-reading is an important aspect of discipleship, not the only. So, spend adequate time in prayer, meditation, fasting, etc.
3. Consider NOT reading the books in order from front to back. I’m telling you Genesis looks different in June than in January.
4. Read along with a commentary or some other type of resource – there are more than 189 to pick from.
5. Use the cross-reference features.
6. Use a notebook to highlight what you’re thinking, what’s new to you and the helpful thoughts form the commentaries, as well as your own insights (some of them will be heretical, some of them will be brilliant).
7. Consider reading with a group. Shouldn’t be too hard to round up some people. Anyone want to read with me?

My New Year’s Resolutions, Perspective and Prayer

I made a sarcastic post a couple days ago and being a believer of resolutions, I thought I should offer a more honest one.

Like all good people, I want to be a better husband, dad, son, brother, son-in-law, brother-in-law, uncle, friend, pastor and Jersey driver.

Indeed I want to pray more, read more Scripture, read more on youth ministry, church work, theology, various Christian genres and may even read a novel this year (like the Marcus Borg one, not the Twilight one). I want to think more logically, allow for more mystery and have grow to have a child-like heart that is amazed at the work of God.

Like all people, I want to be more productive, better organized, improve correspondence between close friends and distant ones.

These are all broad and but hardly measurable so here are a few of my specific new resolutions.  Feel free to share your own.

In honesty, I will be committing to Devotional Reading this year. I am not interested in actually completing a devotional but more of the practice of reading them. In my opinion, certain devotionals get repetitious after a while (like My Utmost for His Highest – which I used to read as if it were a fifth gospel). Over the years, I have acquired roughly 800 devotionals so I cannot blame my lack of options for any failure.

Spend MORE TIME on Facebook and be more intentional about social media. Undoubtedly, our youth ministry has only been served by connecting on mediums like Facebook and Twitter. Initially I thought of creating a number of people that I should connect with per week but I felt that was too objectifying and thought it was counter-productive to consider someone part of my “5” or “25”. So, although I want something measurable, it seems there are other ways to measure something than by using numbers. We’ll see.

Work on the Theology Pub Gathering. I have been talking about this for too long …

Back to some more sarcastic ones so I don’t lose my cred.
I need to drink more coffee so I can stay on top of all of this and need to get more rest. I want to eat better, exercise, and consume products and services more consciously.
Go to more Yankees games.
Take out a second mortgage on my church-given parsonage so I can afford the parking.
Watch more Fox News – Who is this Bob O’Reilly, Glenn Heck, and John Hannity that all these old people are talking about?

And back to a semblance of a conclusion.
There are a few others that I have not mentioned but they either sound vain or awkward when posted online but the Lord knows my heart.  I do enjoy making resolutions because as I mentioned before, we ought to never forfeit an opportunity to better our lives. But one of the blessings of the week was the realization that though not perfect, we enjoyed so much of 2010. Certainly, there were moments and trials that I would have preferred to have gone without (and I realize you can enjoy the goodness of something when you remember the pain of certain times and the character and perseverance that is gained in trials) but it all in all, it was a great year.

In many ways, I hope this year is similar to last but my prayer is to become a more faithful person in what God has called me to be and to do – Amen. May you be blessed with grace and strength in 2011.